<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web-Studio Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/web-studio-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/web-studio-strategy/</link>
	<description>Entertainment strategy and tactics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gordonmattey</title>
		<link>http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/web-studio-strategy/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>gordonmattey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Good call.

I didn&#039;t intend to imply that all you should do is a portal.  You are right, giving people the ability to take it wherever is critical to developing a fan base.  You should let your viewing communities form all over the place .

However note the mechanism I was talking about;

&quot;You need not present this as a traditional portal, it’s really a mechanism that could even be a widget.&quot;

Develop this functionality as a widget, and let your audience take the experience where they want to.  I think there needs to be some serious innovation around an embed.  Right now embeds are very much controlled by the video platform.  I feel there needs to be some more freedom for the producer to control and customise the embed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t intend to imply that all you should do is a portal.  You are right, giving people the ability to take it wherever is critical to developing a fan base.  You should let your viewing communities form all over the place .</p>
<p>However note the mechanism I was talking about;</p>
<p>&#8220;You need not present this as a traditional portal, it’s really a mechanism that could even be a widget.&#8221;</p>
<p>Develop this functionality as a widget, and let your audience take the experience where they want to.  I think there needs to be some serious innovation around an embed.  Right now embeds are very much controlled by the video platform.  I feel there needs to be some more freedom for the producer to control and customise the embed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistairjeffs</title>
		<link>http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/web-studio-strategy/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>alistairjeffs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gordonmattey.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-22</guid>
		<description>why a portal? why not let people take video with them to places they live in everyday? too many portals out there. let the portal play the video and the advertising but let the fan take it with them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why a portal? why not let people take video with them to places they live in everyday? too many portals out there. let the portal play the video and the advertising but let the fan take it with them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
